Thursday, September 05, 2013
Obama and the Syria Civil War
Obama wants to go to war in Syria. From all appearances, this is a civil war between regional Sunni muslims and the Assad based Shiite muslims. Napoleon said "not interfere with the enemy when he is in the process of destroying himself."
Obama has a long way to prove any reason to get involved
1) Who are the rebels and are they worse than Assad?
2) Is there a threat to America?
3) What is our end game / exit strategy?
4) Is any of this worth risking American lives?
5 If we just do an air war, what is the benefit if we replace one dictator with another? Do we really think they'll set up a Jeffersonian democracy.
The case against Saddam was much more compelling than Assad, but Obama and Kerry opposed it. This is mind boggling. Let's compare dictators:
Saddam:
-- Invaded and pillaged Kuwait
-- Broke terms of 1991 cease fire
-- Kicked out weapons inspectors
-- Used chemical weapons on 50,000+ Kurds
-- Defied 18 UN resolutions
-- Tried to assassinate Papa Bush
-- Harbored a 1993 WTC bombing conspirator
-- Paid the families of suicide bombers
Assad
-- May have used chemical weapons on 1,000 people. (Also may have been a false flag by the Sunni 'rebels')
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment